International Conference on Religious Perspectives on Human Rights in Bioethics

December 3-5, 2013

Honk Kong

International Conference on Religious Perspectives on Human Rights in Bioethics

“The conference provided a broad platform for various religious approaches to the issue of human rights and to bioethics in general.  I was also impressed with the scholarship of my colleagues in Hong Kong.” noted Dr. Henk ten Have, Director of the Center for Healthcare Ethics at Duquesne University.

Publication

“Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights”

Editors: Fr. Joseph Tham, Kai Man Kwan, Alberto García Gómez

Publisher: Springer

Year: 2017

Link: Springer.com

Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights book presentation

Publication

Prospettive religiose sui diritti umani nella bioetica

Editors: Fr. Joseph Tham; Fernando Fabò; Alberto Maria Gambino…

Publisher: Studia Bioethica

Year: 2014

Link: Riviste UPRA

Hong Kong Workshop speakers list

We have finalized the speakers list for the Hong Kong Workshop and conference on Human Rights and Multiculturalism.1480675470_ef29c28995

Open session lecturers and moderators

  • Denis Chang, Senior Counsel, Denis Chang’s Chambers, Hong Kong.
  • Henk ten Have, Professor and Director, Center for Healthcare Ethics, Duquesne University, Pittsburg, PA.
  • Alberto Garcia, Director, UNESCO Chair in Bioethics and Human Rights, Rome.
  • Joseph Tham, Professor, School of Bioethics, Regina Apostolorum University, Rome.

Workshop paper presenters and respondents (First on list—Main paper of a religious tradition; Second on list—Respondent from the same religious tradition; Third on list—Respondent from a different religious tradition)

Buddhism

  • Ellen Zhang, Associate Professor of Religion and Philosophy Department, Research Fellow, Centre for Applied Ethics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.
  • Soraj Hongladarom, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
  • Colleen Gallagher, Chief and Executive Director, Section of Integrated Ethics in Cancer Care, Associate Professor, Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Christianity

  • Laura Palazzani, Vice-president, National Bioethics Committee of Italy, Professor of Philosophy of Law, Department of Jurisprudence, LUMSA, Rome.
  • Kai Man Kwan, Head, Department of Religion and Philosophy, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.
  • Aasim Padela, Director of the Initiative on Islam & Medicine, Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago

Confucianism

  • Jonathan Keung Lap Chan, Associate Professor of Religion and Philosophy Department, Associate Director, Centre for Applied Ethics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.
  • Ruiping Fan, Professor of Philosophy, Department of Public & Social Administration, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Alex Yeung, Professor of Philosophy, School of Philosophy, Regina Apostolorum University, Rome.

Daoism

  • Bede Bidlack, Assistant Professor of Theology, Saint Anselm College, Manchester, NH.
  • David Palmer, Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong.
  • Roland Chia, Chew Hock Hin Professor of Christian Doctrine, Trinity Theological College, Singapore.

Hinduism

  • Prakash Desai, Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, UICMC, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
  • John Lunstroth, The Health & Human Rights Research Professor, Health Law & Policy Institute, University of Houston Law Center, Houston, TX.
  • Martha Tarasco, Board Member of the National Academy of Bioethics . Professor of Bioethics School of Bioethics University of Anahuac, Mexico City.

Islam

  • Dariusch Atighetchi, Professor of Islamic Bioethics, Faculty of Theology, Lugano.
  • Nouzha Guessous, Medical Biologist, Researcher and Consultant in Bioethics and Human Rights, Honorary Professor, Hassan II University, Casablanca, (Morocco).
  • Gonzalo Miranda, Dean, School of Bioethics, Regina Apostolorum University, Rome.

Judaism

  • David Heyd, Chaim Perelman Professor of Philosophy, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
  • Jonathan & Adina Halevy, General Director, Shaare Zedek Medical Center; MSW, Psychotherapist, Jerusalem.
  • Hans Ucko, Former Program Executive in the Office on Interreligious Relations and Dialogue of the World Council of Churches, Geneva.

Religious perspectives on human vulnerability

By Fr. Joseph Tham, LC, MD, PhD.
Fellow, UNESCO Chair in Bioethics and Human Rights

Who are the vulnerable?  What are the proper attitudes and responses toward them, especially in the field of biomedicine?

These were the questions discussed at a recent workshop held in Rome from October 9-11, with experts hailing from six world religions—Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism.  This was a follow-up to similar conferences held in Jerusalem two years ago organized by the UNESCO Chair in Bioethics and Human Rights.

The Principle of Vulnerability in the UNESCO Declaration

Protection of human vulnerability and personal integrity was promulgated in a 2005 UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.  However, as Fr. Gonzalo Miranda, LC notes, UN agencies in general do not take into account religious perspectives; even though they recognize that a great number of the world’s population is affiliated with some religious traditions.   Fr. Miranda represented the Holy See in the UNESCO during these meetings leading up to the Declaration.  The Spaniard spoke at the workshop about how the principle of vulnerability passed almost without any major debate among the delegates.

Prof. Henk ten Have who headed this UNESCO effort at the time explained that vulnerability is a new concept in bioethics.  As in any international document, they shied away from controversial terms such as “person” or “justice”.  Nonetheless, vulnerability applies not only to individuals but to families and other stigmatized groups, communities and populations.  There are certain circumstances which renders individuals and groups vulnerable.

This Dutch physician who now heads an ethics program at Duquesne University, explained further that there can be three types of vulnerability:   First, biological vulnerability – there is a state of corporal vulnerability based on innate traits, fragility and threats to the person.  Second, social vulnerability – there are conditions resulting from war, crimes, prejudice, hospitalization and poverty that place the burden of vulnerability.  Third, cultural vulnerability – there are particular traditions and conceptions of certain cultures that categorize, generally or specifically, individuals or groups and render them vulnerable.

Religious perspectives

A particular focus of this conference was the religious and cultural understanding of vulnerability in bioethics.   Sixteen speakers hailing from China, France, India, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Palestine, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand and USA presented papers on how their traditions offer support and protections to vulnerable groups, especially children before and after birth, women, the handicapped and the elderly.

It was clear from the beginning that with so many different religious traditions, and traditions within each tradition, many conceptual problems with vulnerability were raised.  The East-West contrast made discussion very interesting, and at times heated.  For instance, according to Buddhism, vulnerability is not something negative, but a fact of life.

P1050001There are, however, certain trends that can be detected across the board.  There isrecognition of our human condition with its limitations that calls for a response in all religions, albeit with different names: Mercy (hesed) in Judaism, Agape for Christians, Humaneness (ren) in Confucianism, and Compassion in Buddhism, etc.

At the same time, many participants of the workshop find the formulation of vulnerability based on the human rights language too individualistic.  This is somewhat foreign to major religions where the self does not exist in isolation, but is normally immersed in a web of relations—family, friends, religious community, and society.

The emphasis on those who are vulnerable demanding their rights to be protected or given special attention is critiqued as predominantly a Western liberal ideal, which in bioethics is translated to mean patient autonomy and free choice.  In contrast, Confucians place more emphasis on family decisions.  This is echoed in different ways in Hinduism, Islam and Judaism which speaks more of duties than rights towards the weak and underprivileged.  All three branches of Christianity represented at the workshop were not totally comfortable with the liberal exaltation of subjective individualism.

This is not to say that individual rights are unimportant.  In today’s democratic societies, laws have been drafted to protect individuals and communities against slavery, discrimination, torture or genocide.  Yet, there are enormous challenges for these age-old cultures as they catches up to modernity.  For instance, India needed to forego the caste system as unjust and discriminatory, even though this has been ingrained in millennium-long tradition of Hinduism.  Islamic traditions of laws and customs derived from Koranic revelation is at time at odds with international standards on issues such as the status of women or female circumcision.  Christianity has been confronting modernity for the last few centuries in the process called secularization.  While there are definite traces of Judeo-Christian influence in the genesis of human rights, there is palpable unease to include abortion and same-sex marriage as part of these rights.

By gathering experts from these religions, a rare space of dialogue has been created where an atmosphere of friendship and respect reigns.   As Catholics, the encyclical Caritas in Veritate offers us some indications on how to engage in interreligious dialogue to promote peaceful co-existence and solidarity, while avoiding the danger of cultural relativism or eclecticism (§ 26).

Such dialogue and encounters allow us to see the other as our brothers and sisters in our common humanity.   This is more urgent in our globalized reality, and can eliminate suspicions that are sometimes causes of distrust and even violence.

Rome Workshop on “Human Vulnerability”

Second International Bioethics, Multiculturalism and Religion Workshop and Conference on Human Vulnerability

Rome, Italy, October 9-11, 2011

With the advance of biomedicine, certain individuals and groups are vulnerable because of their incapacities to defend themselves.  Many world religions include the protection of the weak, underprivileged and the poor as part of their mission.

In light of the need to deepen our understanding of the principle of human vulnerability and personal integrity, this meeting will consist in a three-day workshop where bioethics experts from major world religions—Judaism, Islam, Christianity, Confucianism, Buddhism, and Hinduism—to discuss the meaning and implications of this principle in their traditions.

History

The first series of “Bioethics, Multiculturalism and Religion” conferences was held in Jerusalem on December 13-14, 2009.  The conferences sought to foster the art of convergence and cooperation in global ethics among experts in bioethics coming from the three monotheistic religions—Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

Second International Workshop and Conference on “Human Vulnerability”

Article 8 of the UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005) states: “In applying and advancing scientific knowledge, medical practice and associated technologies, human vulnerability should be taken into account. Individuals and groups of special vulnerability should be protected and the personal integrity of such individuals respected.”

With the advance of biomedicine, certain individuals and groups are vulnerable because of their incapacities to defend themselves.  The International Bioethics Committee as a UNESCO working group has for the last several years dedicated to deepen this principle of human vulnerability and personal integrity. We wish to supplement this effort with a religious perspective, since a great number of the world’s population is affiliated with some religious traditions.  While we recognize the existence of diversity within each of these traditions, all of them carry in them the mission to protect the weak, the underprivileged and the poor.

This meeting will consist in a two-day workshop where bioethics experts from six major world religions—Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism—gather to discuss the meaning and implications of this principle in their respective traditions.  The third day would be an open conference for the public.

The collection of these papers will result in the publication of a book.

Methodology

Each religious group will be commissioned to write (approx. 10-page) papers that must be submitted on September 1, 2011, about a month before the workshop.

The follow papers will be commissioned:

Each of the six religious groups will write a paper addressing:

  • Anthropology of vulnerability (e.g., questions on human contingency, suffering and mortality)
  • Ethics of vulnerability (e.g., respect, compassion /mercy, charity / love)
  • Legal aspects of vulnerability (religious and civil)

Each of the six religious groups will write a paper addressing certain groups who are especially vulnerable and how they are perceived and attended to in their respective religious traditions:

  • Children before and after birth
  • Women
  • Physically and mentally handicapped
  • The elderly

The workshop will be held on October 9-11, 2011 in Rome. The language of the workshop is English.  Participants of the workshop include:

  • Experts from the six religions who have written and submitted the papers. They are expected to have read all the other papers before attending the workshop.  During each workshop session, they will give a 10 minute summary of their papers followed by an ample period of discussion, clarification, questions and critiques of these papers.
  • Academics who are interested in the topic may participate in the workshop once approved by the organizing committee (Send requests to jtham@unescobiochair.org).  They would need to have read the papers of the group in order to fruitfully engage in the discussions.  Priority is given to discussions in group a).
  • Other academics interested in the workshop who have not read the papers may also participate in the sessions, after approval by the organizing committee.  (Send requests to jtham@unescobiochair.org) They can raise questions only after the above two groups have exhausted the discussions.

It is hoped that these discussions will provide a clear and thorough understanding of each religious tradition on their understanding of vulnerability.  Their papers may also be modified based on this dialog before submission for eventual publication.  It is hoped that some common ideals and visions on vulnerability will emerge from the different religious traditions.

Organizing committee

Alberto Garcia, Director of the UNESCO Chair in Bioethics and Human Rights

Gonzalo Miranda, LC, Fellow of the UNESCO Chair

Joseph Tham, LC, Fellow of the UNESCO Chair

Academic coordinator

Joseph Tham, LC jtham@unescobiochair.org

Advisory Board

Mustafa Abu Sway, Al Quds University, Jerusalem.

Ricardo di Segni, Chief Rabbi of Rome.

Colleen Gallagher, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Christian Hervé, Université René Descartes, Paris.

Ping Cheung Lo, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.

Henk Ten Have, Duquesne University, Pittsburg.

Stamatios Tzitzis, Université Panthéon Assas Paris II, Paris.

 

Chair Director speaks at Unversity of St. Michael’s College

The Canadian Catholic Bioethics Institute and the Order of Malta are hosting a free lecture on September 29 with Prof. Alberto García, JD, UNESCO Chair in Bioethics and Human Rights. Prof. García’s will speak on “Bioethics, Multiculturalism and Religion: Fostering the art of convergence and cooperation in global ethics.”

September 29, 7:00 pm

95 St Joseph Street, Room 101

Faculty of Theology

University of St Michael’s College

All are welcome  |  Free

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization was founded on 16 November, 1945. The UNESCO Chair in Bioethics and Human Rights intends to foster solid scientific preparation and knowledge in bioethics and bio-law that will advance human well-being and solidarity.

The purpose of the project in Bioethics, Multiculturalism and Religion is to create a permanent academic forum that promotes dialogue and bioethical reflection in the light of human rights and duties from different religious perspectives.

One of the four principal activities of the project is encounters of experts at international meetings. This will foster dialogue and exchange of ideas around different religious points of view. It will also provide a statement of points of convergence regarding the most sensitive and current issues in biomedicine, such as neuroethics, mass media, women’s health, etc.

CCBI:

www.ccbi-utoronto.ca

bioethics.usmc@utoronto.ca

416 926 2335